Last edited by Nalabar
Saturday, August 1, 2020 | History

6 edition of Evaluating mental-health programs found in the catalog.

Evaluating mental-health programs

the progress evaluation scales

by David Ihilevich

  • 58 Want to read
  • 6 Currently reading

Published by Lexington Books in Lexington, Mass .
Written in English

    Subjects:
  • Mental health services -- Evaluation.,
  • Community mental health services -- Organ.,
  • Evaluation studies -- Methods.

  • Edition Notes

    Other titlesProgress evaluation scales.
    StatementDavid Ihilevich, Goldine C. Gleser.
    ContributionsGleser, Goldine C.
    Classifications
    LC ClassificationsRA790.5 .I38 1982
    The Physical Object
    Paginationxxi, 215 p. :
    Number of Pages215
    ID Numbers
    Open LibraryOL3786103M
    ISBN 10066905464X
    LC Control Number81048627
    OCLC/WorldCa8386882

    Book Description: The authors review data on the prevalence of youth mental health disorders and schools’ use of student mental health (SMH) programs. They also describe the role of schools in addressing SMH concerns and outline a conceptual model for guiding evaluation of SMH programs. Use the menu at right to explore all of the mental health evaluator training resources in this section. Click the title of a resource below to read or leave comments, or easily share the resource. Introduction to Training for Mental Health Professionals Evaluating Torture Survivors for Asylum Claims.

    Florida’s Infant and Young Child Mental Health Pilot Program, designed to identify families with children at risk for abuse and neglect, and to provide clinical evaluation and treatment services. The evaluation model, intervention strategies, and results presented in . formal training or experience in program evaluation enter into the evaluation decision-making processes, including consultation with professional evaluators. The framework is intended to help those involved in program evaluation address the following six questions: Guiding Questions for Program Evaluation 1. Who is the evaluation fo r? 2.

      Octo Supports Mental Health Programs, Sponsors Motivational Book - Reston, VA - Government contractor and IT company Octo of Reston, Virginia has provided funding for mental health non-profit Rise. Mental Health Outcome Evaluation bridges the gap between traditional research and evaluation methods by presenting an alternative to the highly technical and statistical methods developed in the laboratory for mental health care professionals. It focuses on outcome evaluation of mental health services for adults, concentrating on the general.


Share this book
You might also like
touch of glory

touch of glory

Discrimination against women

Discrimination against women

Extension of Title II of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act

Extension of Title II of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act

Establishing hostels for offenders

Establishing hostels for offenders

economic equation of volunteering

economic equation of volunteering

simple model of host resistance to bark beetles

simple model of host resistance to bark beetles

Cooking the Thai way

Cooking the Thai way

council-chamber, Guildhall

council-chamber, Guildhall

Thats the way it was

Thats the way it was

I protoi pethainan teleftaia

I protoi pethainan teleftaia

John Haden Badley,1865-1967

John Haden Badley,1865-1967

Equal pay and the teaching profession

Equal pay and the teaching profession

Sight & sound

Sight & sound

Political constitution of the First Republic of the Philippines

Political constitution of the First Republic of the Philippines

Canadas constitutional crisis

Canadas constitutional crisis

Exploring the human body

Exploring the human body

Evaluating mental-health programs by David Ihilevich Download PDF EPUB FB2

This book addresses evaluation issues relating to community-based mental health services for children and young people with emotional and behavioural problems. The contributors Evaluating mental-health programs book recent evaluations of the effectiveness of systems of care and Evaluating mental-health programs book intervention strategies.

Program evaluation in the state mental health agency: activities, functions, and management uses [Southern Regional Education Board.] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.

This book was digitized and reprinted from the collections of the University of California Libraries. able on evaluating mental health treatment programs, there is very little literature available on evaluating mental health PEI programs in particular.

Thus, the RAND team evaluating CalMHSA programs sought to create a guide for those interested in evaluating mental health PEI programs. RAND HealthFile Size: KB. CONSIDERATIONS FOR EVALUATING MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMS Tyler Frederick INTRODUCTION Evaluation research involves gathering a wide variety of indicators in order to better understand how a program is operating, its impact, and what can be done to improve it.

The performance indicators that many organizations collect routinely as part of their daily. The CBHSQ’s Office of Evaluation (OE) strives to evaluate programs in an integrated manner combining process, outcome, impact and cost-benefit analysis of evaluation activities.

Evaluation Reports Learn how the Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality works across SAMHSA and the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services to plan. Children with emotional, behavioral, and mental health challenges ; How to access a clinic.

Mental Health Clinics in the community: Contact the clinic directly to arrange an appointment. You can get a list of clinics by calling () NYC-Well (), or by visiting the New York State Office of Mental Health's Program Directory.

In partnership with the NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services and the NYS Commission of Correction, the Forensic Training Program includes: Police Mental Health Recruit Instructor Development Course (3-days); Police Mental Health In. Process evaluation, or how the program addresses the problem, what it does, what the program services are and how the program operates.

Process evaluation questions focus on how a program is working, program performance, and involve extensive monitoring. Similarly, formative evaluation questions look at whether program activities occur Missing: mental-health.

Get this from a library. Evaluating California's mental health programs. [Daniel Chandler; California. Legislature. Assembly. Health Committee. Permanent Subcommittee on Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities.; California. Legislature. Assembly. Office of Research.].

Program evaluation is a tool with which to demonstrate accountability to an array of stakeholders who may include funding sources, policymakers, state, and local agencies implementing the program, and community leaders. Depending on the needs of stakeholders, program evaluation findings may demonstrate that the program makes a contribution to.

Evaluation of Colorado Second Chance Housing and Reintegration Program (C-SCHARP) The C-SCHARP program is a comprehensive approach to prisoner reentry that increases the chances of recovery for identified people on parole with co-occurring substance abuse and mental health disorders by providing evidence-based practices both inside and outside of prison.

This framework aims to improve the evaluation; of health promotion and disease prevention; programs by:; • providing guidance on how to write an evaluation; plan (included in this document); • including an example of a good evaluation plan; (through the Health Promoting Communities:; Being Active and Eating Well (HPC:BAEW); evaluation plan); • specifying.

View our complete catalog of authoritative Program Evaluation related book titles and textbooks published by Routledge and CRC Press. Additional Physical Format: Online version: Ihilevich, David.

Evaluating mental-health programs. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books, © (OCoLC) Consumer groups and legislators are clamoring for accountability and higher degrees of service relevance from mental health providers.

This trend has evolved because mental health agencies have established programs without clearly defined objectives, and have resisted the evaluation of their services. This paper addresses these issues and presents an evaluation model for a.

Effective program evaluation is a systematic way to improve and account for public health actions by involving procedures that are useful, feasible, ethical, and accurate. The Framework for Evaluation in Public Health [1] guides public health professionals in their use of program evaluation.

It is a practical, nonprescriptive tool, designed to. Community Services and Supports (CSS) Outcomes and Priority Indicators. A report prepared by Mental Health Data Alliance that provides outcomes of FSP programs across age groups, counties, regions and the state () - Statewide Full Service Partnership (FSP) Outcomes Report Evaluation reports by UCLA analyzing relevant existing data to measure mental health.

What is monitoring and evaluation. 9 Aspects of a mental health policy and plan requiring evaluation 10 Monitoring and evaluating a mental health policy and plan 12 Research methods for evaluating a mental health policy and plan 14 Experimental designs 15 Non-experimental designs 15 Economic evaluation During the past 20 years there have been two notable phases in the development of VA MH/SA services.

The first was initiated by the leader of mental health programs in VA central office from – and involved expansion of specialized mental health programs such as Assertive Community Treatment, homeless outreach, and transitional employment.

The integration of education and mental health services in schools have evolved over the past several years. School-based mental health programs have many benefits, including greater access and improved effectiveness as compared to clinic or hospital-based services. Proponents of school-based mental health services argue that schools are.

A mental health enterprise may be described by either (a) rather general philosophical total mental health goals, or (b) highly diverse and individualized patient-therapist goals. Goals a. have not provided a workable framework for program evaluation.

This paper proposes that evaluation be done in the framework of goals b. by setting up, before treatment, a measurable .Evaluation is the effort to detect changes in output, outcomes, and impacts associated with interventions and to attribute those changes to the interventions.

community-level obesity prevention interventionsInterventions refer to programs, systems, policies, environmental changes, services, products, or any combination of these multi-faceted.PROGRAM EVALUATION REPLICATIONS 39 Key Words: school-based mental health services, program evaluation, chroni-cally disruptive students, family-community interventions, replication studies Introduction School-based mental health services were first introduced in the early s, coinciding with the development of school-based health centers.